top of page

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Submit

Thank you for subscribing!

Invalid email. Please try again!

Pink Poppy Flowers

Contact

New Projects & General Inquiries
hello@omgivning.com


Media & Press Inquiries
media@omgivning.com

Hiring

careers@omgivning.com

Visit

1301 N. Broadway
Los Angeles, CA 90012

Follow

Facebook
Instagram
LinkedIn

imgi_58_Bottom2Blockleft.jpg

Titl here

imgi_59_NorellaPointingCulture.jpg

Titl here

imgi_20_Photo-Joshua_White-jwpictures.com-Hotel_Checkin_Lobby.jpg

Titl here

Journal

Filter by

All Topics

Adaptive Reuse

Advocacy

Architecture

Awards

Charrettes

Code Reform

COVID-19

Culture

Design

Design Milestones & Project Journeys

Downtown LA

FAIA

Human Centered Design

IIDA

Innovation

Interiors

Karin Liljegren

LA County

Office Design

Published Media

Restaurant Design

Revitalization

Sustainability

Workplace Design

Workplace Strategy

Advocacy - City of LA Building Code Amendments: Adaptive Reuse Alternative Building Standards

  • Omgivning
  • Sep 23
  • 3 min read
ree

Agency / Organization:Los Angeles Department of Building and Safety (LADBS) / Los Angeles Fire Department (LAFD)


Status:In Progress - LADBS/LAFD working on alternative building standards Q3/Q4 2024. Currently on hold.


Intent:

The City of Los Angeles is rewriting their alternative building standards for the adaptive reuse of underutilized buildings to convert to residential use. When converting a building from an existing use to a new use, building codes require this change of use to bring the building up to current code. Bringing an existing building into compliance with current code can be impractical, and in most cases not viable, due to existing conditions and the high cost of upgrading buildings to a new use. The purpose is to make the adaptive reuse of our underutilized existing buildings more viable for conversion. The alternative codes will help reduce costs of conversions, as well as provide more certainty for Developers and Architects as to what will be required from LADBS (Los Angeles Department of Building and Safety) and LAFD (Los Angeles Fire Department). Without these alternative codes, each building would have to request modifications to the code that are reviewed on a case-by-case basis for approval which can often take 6-12 months. These new codes would help to reduce the amount of these case-by-case approvals, shave off significant plan check time and provide more certainty on what the City will allow. It is difficult for Developers to get funding or to keep their projects on track if there are significant unknowns that have big cost impacts on projects.


The City of LA would replace the relatively defunct LABC Chapter 85 that provided guidelines and clarity for what alternative standards would be allowed for the adaptive reuse of buildings. Chapter 85 was originally written to assist the new Adaptive Reuse Ordinance that came out in 1999. Both the ordinance and the building code were written particularly with one building type in mind - the 1920s historic high rises that existed in LA’s historic core. This new Chapter 85B is meant to update the old code, as well as to go hand in hand with LA’s new Adaptive Reuse Ordinance coming online in 2025 that will be updated and also expanded to be Citywide. This new ordinance will open up the planning/zoning incentives to the entire city, and also to a much broader range of building types including more recent buildings that may have reasonably compliant fire life safety and other systems.


Omgivning is one of 3 small private sector firms that has been workshopping the alternative codes with LADBS and LAFD. Our boots-on-the-ground experience, as well as our involvement with the Planning Department’s Adaptive Reuse Ordinance, have been critical to having a holistic understanding of the impact of various code requirements and being able to propose alternatives to appease all parties. In particular, it is difficult for city staff to understand the impact of their policies on the many different types of buildings or existing conditions. It is important to marry the intent of the planning/zoning policy which was to give Developers an incentive for adaptive reuse, such as allowing an addition on the roof. With alternative building codes, we must also take into consideration a roof addition without triggering significant additional requirements which might make that small addition infeasible and could potentially make the entire project infeasible.


Advocacy



bottom of page